Information has recently been leaked by a Clinton campaign staffer describing in more detail what Senators Obama and Clinton were talking about during their meeting in DC at the home of Dianne Feinstein. This staffer, who asked to remain anonymous, says that “Senator Clinton respectfully asked Senator Obama whether he would like to be her vice president. After declining, Obama challenged Clinton to a hide-and-seek match. Clinton, unbeknownst to most as the 1995 & 1996 world hide-and-seek champion, welcomed Obama’s challenge. The rules of the contest dictate that if Senator Obama finds Senator Clinton on or before November 4th, he wins. If not, she wins.”

According to this same staffer, Obama has agreed to pay off Clinton’s campaign debt in the case that she wins. Oddly enough, he never asked for a reward if he wins. “If these are the kinds of deals Barack Obama makes, then whats gonna happen with foreign policy? Will he make a deal with the Arabs to give them back Iraq and not get anything back?” Says Andrew Forner, a loyal Clinton supporter.

The Obama campaign has announced an exploratory committee to find Clinton, but as of now says they are “too strapped financially to devote any funds and/or staff to such a worthy opponent”. One can only guess what the Obama campaign may have up their sleeves in an event such as this.

As of now, the clock is ticking and the question on everyones mind is, “where in the world is Hillary Clinton?” Only time will tell, but recent evidence seems to say that she may be in Bosnia.

In other news: After learning about the hide-and-seek competition, Bill Clinton has reportedly planned multiple parties at his mansion throughout the months of June and July. So far, the only invited guests include: the Playboy bunnies, Senator Clinton’s female campaign staff across the entire country, and the infamous Monica Lewinsky. Clearly, the Former President has full confidence in his wife’s hiding ability and thus has found reason to celebrate before her victory…

Is it possible that neither Obama nor McCain win enough electoral votes to be the winner come this Fall for the 2008 Presidential election? This map, although unlikely, is still a possible outcome – changing only swing states and not leaving the realm of possibility.

Once again, this is a very possible outcome. By giving McCain NH, NV, OH, and FL – This leaves both candidates 1 short of claiming victory! Although if the House of Representatives were to decide, it would obviously favor Senator Obama…

Recently I made my own prediction of what I think will happen come November in the General Election. As you can see, I have Obama winning without even the swing states of Ohio and Florida. Some may think this is crazy, but I believe this math (depending on the future) is a very possible scenario, especially after the bump Obama gets now that Clinton has left. I will update this as time goes by…

The swing states I gave Obama were CO, NM, IA, MN, WI, MI, and NH. 

The swing states I gave McCain were NV, IN, VA, NC, SC, GA, and MO. 

Any of these states could go to the other candidate, but looking at polls and history, I think this is a very logical result. The Vice Presidency choice will also possibly effect the math, but not necessarily. I should also mention that Nebraska is divided by congressional district, so its possible Obama could lose the state, but still get a few electoral votes.

Ohio and Florida are currently just too close to call. But if I had to guess, I would give Ohio to Obama and Florida to McCain. Once again though, I think this math is very fair to both sides. And Obama has a very good chance of picking of Nevada, Virginia, and maybe even Georgia/South Carolina/North Carolina. With Libertarian Bob Barr running, McCain may lose enough votes in those states to be crippled…
 

Here are the results from the 2004 election:

Here was a map recently created based on current polling data:

What do you think?

(Updated 6/2008 ) To reflect Obama vs. McCain and all new data…

I’ll be the first to say Senator Obama isn’t perfect, just like every other candidate. As a moderate, I strongly disagree with anyone who is a single party or single issue voter. Knowing the strengths and weaknesses of each candidate and disagreeing on certain issues with Senator Obama, I still believe he is the best candidate for the 2008 Presidency.

Coming from a very conservative background, many people have asked me why I would support Obama. I admit that I disagree with him on certain issues: Affirmative Action, Abortion, and a few others. However I do agree with him on most issues: Iraq, Foreign Policy in general, Economics (more so then McCain), Healthcare (partially), Education, and much more…

The reason I can disagree with Obama on abortion and feel justified is because I know McCain won’t do anything about it either. And if it comes down to Supreme Court judges, I’m sorry but I’m not going to base my entire vote for President on who he might nominate as a judge. Not to mention that its becoming more doubtful anyone will touch that issue with a stick let alone try to overturn it! Bush was virtually elected on moral issues like abortion, and even with all 3 branches on the Republican side they still haven’t really changed anything!

Obama is incredibly intelligent and is one of the greatest leaders of our time. He may not have as much experience, but I think he makes up for it in sheer brilliance and great judgment. You must also take into consideration that some great presidents were his age or younger (Teddy Roosevelt, Bill Clinton, and more. It just so happens that McCain’s role model is Teddy Roosevelt – Ironic). He is motivational and gives hope to a country that has been quite hopeless for many years. He also has shown more integrity on the campaign trail then I have seen or read of from any politician in recent history. Focusing on the real issues: He will bring an end to the War in Iraq, which was waged under false pretenses, and slowly begin withdrawing troops in an organized and responsible manner under the supervision of the generals. He brings a much better understanding of economic policy then McCain does (who has said he knows little about economics – and shown it), who will continue the policies of Bush and do little to lower our mounting National Debt (around 9-10 Trillion). Obama will bring a fresh understanding, motivation, and bipartisanship to fix issues like Immigration, Education, and Healthcare reform. He will work for Universal Healthcare (I’m still not sure I support the details, but I do support a change in any direction as this clearly isn’t working and standing still is pointless). His Foreign Policy shows a wisdom and maturity that will not only support our national security interests but will also raise the level of opinion citizens of the International world see in Americans. He supports talking with everybody, citing that we ought never fear to negotiate, and he leaves war for a last choice only if necessary – which is the right way to go, we won’t be as hated and we won’t be caught up in unnecessary fighting. His policy towards Iran moves towards the future rather then going backwards in the past. He also supports unilaterally supports Israel while vowing not to force them to do anything that they don’t want to do and is not in their own interests (something American presidents have been doing for a LONG time). Lastly, Obama’s policies will help secure an environmentally safer world and will help us cut our dependence on oil while truly investing in the energy of the future – McCain has yet to come up with a clear plan to fight the energy crisis beyond a gas tax holiday, which will barely help the average consumer and could actually hurt him! 

The most important issues to me currently are: The Economy (specifically the Energy Crisis), Foreign Policy, Education, Healthcare, Abortion, and the Environment. Except for Abortion, Obama is superior to McCain in my opinion, and that is while I’ll be supporting him come November.

Strengths:

1) McBush 08? – Obama simply has an advantage by running after Bush. The GOP hasn’t been so weak for many years, and the Democrats are winning elections in areas that are unheard of! McCain will obviously be tagged to Bush through the whole election (which is fair and unfair in different ways), and currently, more people would support the policies of Obama then they would the policies of McCain (if they’re at all similar to Bush’s – which some are and some aren’t). Most importantly, Obama is the candidate that will bring us out of Iraq. Most American’s support this, and it will be a huge hurdle for McCain to overcome…

2) Leadership, Vision, and Judgment: Obama is a strong leader, ready and willing to go up against the establishment. He wants to stop the political bickering and abuse while using hope and inspiration to take America down a new course. Rather then going in political circles, Obama will hopefully go right through to the heart of the problems facing America. Obama also has an exemplary vision for America. He is optimistic of what we can accomplish while still being realistic about how we can go about it. He is passionate about cleaning up the garbage in Washington and making a country where people can hope again and have high expectations, rather then watch their representatives continually fail them. Lastly, Obama has an incredible amount of wisdom and intelligence, the best example of this is his ability to see through the War in Iraq from the beginning. He has the street smarts necessary to look at things logically and make good decisions, while he also graduated with many honors from Columbia and Harvard University. Such a combination makes a good/wise leader, especially when adding his social skills…

3) Money $$$ – Obama raises an unprecedented amount of money from contributors. He will be raising 2 to 3 times more money then McCain throughout the entire General Election. This gives him the ability to campaign more in the swing states and possibly flip undecided voters.

4) Electoral Math – Obama puts into play many states that could put him over-the-top without the help of even Ohio or Florida! Think I’m crazy? If Obama wins the traditional Democratic states and wins the swing states of NV, IA, CO, NM, NH, MI, MN, WI, and PA – he wins! That doesn’t even consider the possibility of winning OH, FL, MO, VA, NC, IN, GA, or SC (all swing states). Thanks to the HUGE registration of Democrats, they currently outnumber registered Republicans by 15-20%.

5) Bipartisanship/Likeablity: I am convinced with his charm and rhetoric, Obama will bring this nation together and strengthen out ties across the country. With the latest Presidency’s, Republicans and Democrats have continually pushed away from each other, getting to the point where they can’t even speak or love one another. Although Obama is clearly a Democrat, he brings people together; even if they don’t agree. Hopefully this will also be seen on an International scale.

Weaknesses:

1) Experience – Obama is generally cited for not having enough political, and especially, foreign policy experience. Although I admit that he doesn’t have an a plethora of experience, he does have more experience then most credit him for. However, compared to McCain being in the Senate for over 20 years and having military experience, clearly Obama’s greatest weakness will be the lack of experience in comparison.

2) Liberalism – If you haven’t heard, a study came out last year saying Obama was the most Liberal Senator based on his voting record. I can guarantee that Republicans will eat this up! It might also convince moderates/independents that he is too far to the left.  

3) Race, Name & Nationality – Sadly Senator Obama will still take a hit because of his being black. Such a factor must be counted as a political weakness, as well as his name: Barack Hussein Obama. Some people will continue to say he is a secret Muslim and distribute lies, and thus he will continue to have a hard time getting past the non-sense. Just for your information… Barack Obama has a white mother from Kansas and a black father (Sr.) from Kenya (from where he got his name). He was born in Hawaii, but after his parents divorced he lived in Jakarta, Indonesia for 4 years with his new-stepfather who was from there. Later he moved back to Hawaii and eventually would attend Columbia and then Harvard University. Obama is a Christian, part of the United Church of Christ – he is NOT Muslim. its also thanks to his race that he won’t be winning, KY, WV, and AR (all states Clinton is winning but Obama isn’t – I wonder why?)

4) Personal Issues/Attacks – Obviously Obama will still have to make it through the hurdles of Reverend Wright, Bill Ayers, and other attacks that may carry on a little longer in the election season. 

5) Voting Blocs – Obama has been having a very hard time capturing the votes of white women, blue collar workers, latinos, senior citizens, and Jews. He will have to make inroads into all of these blocs if he wants to have victory come November.

“If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more, and become more, you are a leader.” — John Adams

Many names have been thrown around as possible VP choices, however I hope to bring some clarity to what seems to be a major media field day without many facts or logic. I will thus write my personal Top 5 choices as well as why I would not consider other choices to be possible – My list once again is my “personal favorites”, I will also write within how likely McCain is to pick them…

Thus, here are my favorite 5 (according to personal preference, not necessarily viability) and then those who are more unlikely. On the bottom are the 6 most likely candidates as of now:

1) Mike Huckabee – Governor of Arkansas. Some may think this is an odd first, but I very much like and respect Governor Huckabee. He has a lot of integrity, experience, and balls. He is a tell it like it is man as well as being younger and generally well liked on both sides. History, during the time when Huckabee was still in the race, shows that these two could fit very well together, and Huckabee’s personality is very likeable (similar to Obama), which would take aim away from McCain’s age. He’s also great on the campaign trail and is well known since he was the last GOP candidate to drop out! Huckabee would deliver the social conservatives, but it doesn’t look like they’re as important in this election then they were in the last few elections. I also think all in all, Huckabee would be the best man to take McCain’s job if something happened. Huckabee is very smart, experienced, and is able to see both sides for what they are. Many times in the election he has said things that weren’t politically correct, but were the truth – and I’ll always support a man with that heart. Sadly, he is an unlikely choice. Back during his run, most people saw him as the “faith” candidate rather then the candidate with actual experience and ability. Many people don’t think he’s conservative enough on fiscal issues, and he’s also angered some independents from some of his talk on religion and his “faith based politics”. Lastly, he doesn’t really help in the electoral college, which is a real bummer – had he been Governor of Ohio I’ll bet he would be at the top of the list. Sadly, McCain already has Arkansas and he needs a VP who is taken seriously – which Huckabee should, but isn’t.

2) John Kasich – Former Congressman of Ohio. Kasich would be a very interesting and unexpected choice, but he brings many strengths to McCain’s ticket. He was known as a budget hawk back while he was in office and would probably get along well with McCain. He helps McCain with his conservative base and he helps McCain in the crucial swing state of Ohio. I question how effective an attack dog he would be, but all in all in should definitely be considered for the job. He is, however, thinking strongly about running for Governor of Ohio in 2010, which may dampen his desire to be VP. But from what I know of Kasich, I think he’d be very open to being the VP.

3) Sarah Palin – Governor of Alaska. McCain definitely doesn’t need help with that state, but she would help with women voters at a time where women might be disgruntled once Clinton leaves center stage. Depending on who Obama picks as his VP, a woman VP might be very helpful to McCain. But if Obama chooses Clinton, I’m not sure she would be very effective. Women tend to lean Democrat, and they will stay with Clinton if they see her name on the ballot; not to mention that in a debate between Palin and Clinton, she would be massacred and Clinton (as a woman) would not have to pull any punches… But against any other candidate, she could be very effective.

4) Mark Sanford – Governor of South Carolina. He is pretty well known in political circles and is a staunch conservative, which will help McCain reassure the base, and is well known for his concern against pork barrel spending; thus giving the Senator and Sanford something in common. The two would probably work well together and Sanford will bring a youthful aspect to McCain that he really needs. Also, against Obama, it doesn’t hurt to shore up South Carolina for the Republicans and probably get a little more support from surrounding states. The question is whether Sanford has a long enough record and whether he can help McCain in his difficulties with domestic policy.

5) Charlie Crist – Governor of Florida. Crist is an obvious possibility because he can deliver Florida. Although polling looks decent right now for McCain in Florida, Obama is likely to get a surge once Clinton voters start going his way and there is NO WAY McCain will win this election without Florida. Thus, as time goes by, if McCain has any worries he really won’t have a choice. But Crist is also very well liked in Florida and also brings a youth to McCain’s old age. Crist doesn’t have a very long record of experience, but he is a Governor who will bring Florida, and McCain probably has enough experience for the both of them. Unless something happens to McCain I suppose…

OTHERS –

Mitt Romney – Former Governor of Massachusetts. I’m not a big fan of Romney, however polls show right now that the most important issue to voters is the economy, and people will probably be pretty disappointed in McCain’s record and experience on the economy come November if he doesn’t pick a VP with any of it. Although its very doubtful for Romney to bring his state of Massachusetts to the Republican side, his lengthy and successful experience in the Private Sector guarantees him at least a consideration. He does however give McCain a possibility of winning Michigan, Colorado, New Hampshire, and Nevada. He also is very well liked in conservative circles and is well known due to the primary season. Negatives include his nasty fight with McCain for the nomination and the fact that they probably don’t like each other very much. He is also a very polarizing figure and we must of course bring up his Mormonism. Lastly, the Democrats will have a great time pointing out all of Romney’s flip flops – so overall I would say he is very unlikely unless McCain’s need for a business experienced conservative becomes desperate. 

Bobby Jindal – Governor of Louisiana. Jindal is VERY young, not yet 37, which can be helpful or hurtful. Although McCain needs youth, he doesn’t want a complete amateur without experience – especially in domestic issues. Still Jindal is very well liked and once again deserves at least a little consideration. However, I doubt he’ll be the pick without much experience or any help in the electoral college (once again, McCain doesn’t really need help in Louisiana). 

Tim Pawlenty – Governor of Minnesota. Republicans don’t have much of chance of winning MN, not even with the help of their Governor. Pawlenty was barely re-elected, so McCain’s chances would still be slim. Although he might bring a little youth, this seems to be a very unlikely candidate when you put the facts together.

Joe Lieberman – Senator of Connecticut. First off, he’s a Democrat (technically an Independent), but Lieberman definitely doesn’t shore up support for the base. Also, he adds to the Senior Citizens ticket! Lastly, Lieberman has cast pretty loud doubts about his being the VP choice or even accepting it if it were offered. I doubt he would say such things if he was truly being considered. However, if McCain could strike enough fear into the hearts of Republicans against Obama to come vote in November, Lieberman could be helpful in getting more Independents and Democrats to vote Republican.

Not Likely - 

1) Condoleezza Rice – Secretary of State. I don’t think this merge is possible. First of all, McCain needs to get AWAY from Bush, not make Bush’s top advisor his VP. Second, Rice brings the same experience McCain already has (foreign policy), and adds nothing to his lacking of domestic policy. There is no reason to put her on the ticket.

2) Carly Florina – Former Hewlett-Packard CEO. Although also a woman, Florina adds no political experience to this ticket whatsover. She is from CA, but doubtfully will bring many votes at all to McCain. She may have business experience, but if something were to happen to McCain, she would have no idea what to do as President.

3) Rob Portman – Former Congressman from Ohio. Once again, why would McCain make his VP a former Bush official? Portman also doesn’t guarantee a win in Ohio. Although he does know about the economy, he isn’t well known and adds nothing politically. 

4) Colin Powell – Former Secretary of State/War General. Powell, although well liked, doesn’t add any experience McCain doesn’t already have. Also, I think Powell would actually be more interested as Obama’s VP then McCain’s. Either way though, he is unlikely to accept and quite unnecessary. 

5) Rudy Giuliani – Former Mayor of NYC. Giuliani doesn’t help much with social conservatives and has a really bad rap sheet. The Democrats will be able to dig up a lot of dirt and he doesn’t make New York viable either. I also don’t know how great a rapport McCain and Giuliani have either.

6) Fred Thompson – Former Senator from TN. Thompson will also add to the Senior Citizens ticket; even though he isn’t that old, he sure acts like it! He doesn’t help with the electoral math nor does he help much in general to cover McCain’s weaknesses.

7) Jeb Bush – Former Governor of Florida. Look at the last name. Period.

If there are any others I left out, then they’re highly unlikely to be the VP choice. However, if you have a name, you can post it and I can tell you why I think they would be an unlikely choice. Below I will put who I think are the most likely for McCain to choose. (I will update this as time goes on)

1) Charlie Crist
2) Mitt Romney
3) Mark Sanford
4) Mike Huckabee
5) Sarah Palin 
6) John Kasich

All biases aside, Barack Obama is simply the better General Election candidate against John McCain. If you like Clinton and want to vote for her, thats fine, but don’t be fooled into believing that she is more likely to win…

Obama is the more electable candidate for 3 reasons:

1) Obama will have an easier time explaining his position on the Iraq War. Clinton initially voted for the war and later against. Now I’m not trying to demean Clinton, only to give the facts that with McCain as the nominee national defense and specifically the Iraq War will be a huge issue and Obama has the advantage of always having been against the war. Thus with Obama as the nominee, the two candidates will have views as different as black and white. This will really help the Democrats get all the anti-war voters, which are the majority.

2) Hilary Clinton is currently viewed as the “experience” candidate, while Obama is the “change” candidate. Since Obama has 12 years in elected office compared to Clinton’s 8, I don’t much appreciate the simple stereotype (even though I do give her some credit for her years in the White House). However, we must deal in facts and those are the current stereotypes. But in the General Election, McCain is BY FAR the experience candidate as he was virtually born in the Senate and while not in the Senate he was fighting for his country and was a POW. McCain’s strengths trump Clinton’s! So what would the new stereotypes be? McCain – “the experienced in foreign and domestic affairs” : and Clinton – “the Democrat”… However, with Obama as the candidate it will be once again Change vs. Experience, and I like those odds considering the advantage Democrats automatically have over Republicans.

3) MOST IMPORTANTLY! Clinton is a glass ceiling. She is winning not so much by gaining votes but by keeping them. Those who support her have done so the whole time because everybody knows her name, Obama is not as well known and must simply continue to take voters away from her. The more time given, the less people will be voting for her – which is the opposite of Obama. This correlates into McCain, whose OBVIOUS deficiency is his own conservative base. McCain does well with independents and even some Dems. but he is having a terrible time with his own base and will not be able to energize them (although I guarantee Clinton will, just not in the way she would want). So come General Election time, the best Democratic candidate will be one who has a strong support among Dems. (which Obama does/will), one who does REALLY well with independents (which ONLY Obama does), and one who can even challenge the Republican base (which ONLY Obama can possibly do). The last part is key, because if McCain can’t win the conservative base, that leaves many Republicans who would truly consider voting for Obama. Also, as was seen on Super Tuesday, Obama did really well in the South! However, they would never vote for Clinton, whose name is virtually burned in effigy in the South…

Such arguments used for Clinton’s better electability are such ambiguous statements as “I’ve been through this before”. Whatever that means… Its called an election versus a Republican, all Dems. have been through “that” before. I agree she has been through it worse and more often, but that doesn’t guarantee a win by any means, especially when compared to the 3 logical reasons as stated above.

Thus, whether you want to vote for him or not, Obama is logically the best General Election candidate the Democrats have, Period. To be completely honest, a win by Barack Obama would be a nightmare for John McCain…

Although I don’t like criticizing my favorite candidate, I feel once again that I must in the sake of honesty and unbiased reporting. Recently there has been some controversy over Obama’s church. Supposedly Obama was shocked over all the questions over his religion/place of worship, which is a joke considering he is running for president and in many minds is still considered a muslim (which isn’t true btw).


I have visited the churches website, and although I am not as outraged as many others, I still am a bit surprised and worried. Many of the most important values of the church are cultural not biblical. It calls itself “unashamedly black”, which begs the question whether white people are allowed – and if not, then I would have to reconsider my support of Obama since supporting such a church and being spiritually lead by such a church is completely wrong and unbiblical. It would be reverse racism to the highest degree, without the violence at least…


Another factor has been Obama’s Pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright. First of all, he shouldn’t be preaching politics from the pulpit, at least not unashamedly biased politics. He said “Some argue that blacks should vote for Clinton “because her husband was good to us,” he continued. “That’s not true,” “He did the same thing to us that he did to Monica Lewinsky.”


First of all I’m not sure what that means… Bill Clinton had sex with America? Second, he’s at the pulpit! For such actions many churches lose their tax exemption, and if he continues he should as well. Third, make a logical and intelligent for goodness sakes if your gonna make one at all! And fourth, WHAT DOES THAT MEAN???


Although I’m glad Obama disavowed his pastors comments, the Reverend is going to be a big liability if he doesn’t learn to shut his mouth. And I’m still a bit disturbed by the churches theology. I’m gonna have to learn more though before I make any really big decisions on the subject…


This is Obama’s church website:
http://www.tucc.org/about.htm

Recently Mike Huckabee has signed the “No Amnesty Pledge” from numbersUSA: pledging in part to no “amnesty or any other special path to citizenship for the millions of the foreign nationals unlawfully present in the United States.”


In my opinion this is completely illogical and ridiculous. Perhaps its just an election stunt and he’s doing it to garner votes and there is a touchback condition to it, but even to say such a thing is just a lie or completely naive. There is no way we can send back every illegal immigrant in America! Even if we knew where they all were, and we made a condition separating those who were born here, we STILL couldn’t do it.


First of all it would be bad policy. Illegal immigrants do play a part in our economy and our country, whether we like it or not. Although they can and do create big problems in large numbers, they can create problems if they’re non-existent as well. Also, how do we find all of these people? And then where is the HUGE amount of money in police support to do all the work in finding, capturing, and sending them home?


No amnesty is illogical and out of the question for anybody who sincerely wants to solve this issue. First we need to secure the borders. Then we need to focus on how we can fix the damage already done, and the only logical way to do that is send some home and give amnesty with a penalization for the rest. It may be hard to swallow, and its not fair. But its the only way, and as adults you must swallow what is best even if its difficult. Especially when it has to do with the best interests of your country and millions of Americans!

“I think the radical view is to say that we’re going to change the definition of marriage so that it can mean two men, two women, a man and three women, a man and a child, a man and animal,” he said in the interview, published on the Web site Wednesday. “Again, once we change the definition, the door is open to change it again.” (CNN)


_____________________________________________________________


I would like to commend Governor Huckabee on being a politician who can actually think LOGICALLY and INTELLIGENTLY on issues – at least sometimes considering my next post…


Recently Huckabee has gotten a lot of crap from the press and gay activists especially for this comment that supposedly equates homosexuality to bestiality. This is not true at all, and only by severe misrepresentation and stupidity can you come to such a conclusion.


What Huckabee is actually saying is that due to the slippery slope, if we allow homosexuals to have a traditional marriage under the same idea as a marriage between a man and woman, whose to say 50 years from now someone won’t make the exact same arguments to the court about polygamy, sex with minors, and YES bestiality??? One uses the EXACT same arguments for gay marriage as one would use to legalize those 3 things. Perhaps they aren’t as acceptable today, but neither way gay marriage 50 years earlier from today!


Huckabee understands that by granting this request for gay marriage, we are once again putting dust on the thin line that defines American ethics. Once again allowing us to trample the line without even realizing it…


Mark my words, if gay marriage becomes law, it will only be a short time before somebody realizes that by using the same arguments it is unconstitutional for the government to say its illegal for a 40 year old to have sex with a 16 year old. Why do they get to put limits on love? And why can’t a psychologist make love to a patient? Its not manipulation baby! Its love! And why can’t I marry more then one person? I’ve got enough love to pass around! And finally, if a dog IS mans best friend, then shouldn’t we be encouraged to marry our best friends???


You decide. But always remember that your decisions may have consequences that go beyond your wildest dreams…




So let me ask a question of those of you whose intelligence may vastly outweigh my own… Without the bible and traditional “laws” (which basically all come from the bible), why would it be wrong to practice polygamy, sex with minors, and even bestiality? Besides the obvious “it doesn’t feel right”…? If we want a COMPLETE separation of church and state (which by the way thats not what the founding fathers intended), then I think those things as well as obviously gay marriage ought to be accepted! Why wait 50 more years to do what we can logically do now?